|
|
ricerca
nel sito motori di rierca
|
|
|
|
|
documenti nella sezione
|
|
|
analisi della letteratura
in merito alla comunicazione facilitata
(cenciarelli i., mona a., 1999)
autismo:
è legato alla carenza di un enzima? - abstract
(cohen e., 1997)
autismo e linguaggio
(atzori g., 2003)
autismo ed epilessia
(a cura del prof. curatolo p., 1999)
dimetilglicina, un
metabolite non tossico e l'autismo
(rimland b., 1996)
i testi dei facilitati
svolgono le funzioni della lingua parlata?
(cenciarelli i., 1999)
il legame fra il
vaccino mmr e l'autismo ora č pių chiaro
(fracer l., 2000)
il profilo cognitivo
delle persone autistiche
(mona a., 1999)
l'autismo: nuovi
esami per trovarne le cause e migliorarne la prognosi
(hanau c., tratto dal sito 'autismo triveneto', 1999)
l'intervento evolutivo
multicomponenziale (i.e.m.) in soggetti autistici
(guazzo g. m., aliperta d., cozzolino g., fabrizio c., liotta
d., trinchese i., pervenuto alla bma il 12-11-2000)
l'uso di diete senza
glutine e caseina con persone con autismo
(autism research unit, 1999)
la comunicazione
facilitata in ambito giudiziario
(cenciarelli i., mona a., 1999)
le rappresentazioni
della relazione tra operatori e bambini autistici
(d'amore s., onnis l., 1998)
linguaggio segnato
o comunicazione simultanea
(edelson s. m.)
risultati a lungo
termine per bambini con autismo che hanno ricevuto un trattamento
comportamentale intensivo precoce
(O. I. Lovaas, J. J. McEachin, T. Smith, 1993)
ruolo dell'immunogenetica
nella diagnosi di patologie post-vaccinali nel sistema nervoso centrale
- abstract
(montinari m. g., 1995)
secretina, aggiornamento
di dicembre 1999: la questione della sicurezza
(rimland b., 1999)
secretina: notizie
positive e negative alla "fine del primo inning"
(rimland b., 1999)
sistema immunitario
e autismo: alcune considerazioni
(colamaria v., pervenuto alla bma il 18-04-2001)
teoria della mente
e autismo
(atzori g., 2003)
trattamento comportamentale
ed educazione normale e funzionamento intellettivo nei bambini
autistici
(lovaas o. i., 1987)
un trattamento
omeopatico per l'autismo
(micozzi a., benassi f., 2002)
|
|
|
indietro
| inizio
|
|
|
SECRETIN UPDATE, DECEMBER 1999: THE SAFETY ISSUE
B. Rimland, 1999
Autism
Research Institute, 41182 Adams
Avenue, San Diego, CA 92116.
(testo in italiano)
Secretin is widely regarded as being remarkably safe. In the several
decades that the hormone secretin has been used clinically worldwide,
there have been no published reports of significant adverse effects.
During the past two years, according to our best estimates, about
10,000 doses of secretin have been administered to several thousand
autistic children, by several hundred physicians, with few noteworthy
side effects. Until recently, the side effects reported have been
primarily increased hyperactivity (16%), stimming (5%), and aggressiveness
(4%). These problems have usually subsided in less than one week
(77%) or less than two weeks (90%). (Percentages are based on 1,089
responses.)
In our March, 1999 newsletter, we mentioned a two-year-old boy
who experienced a seizure while secretin was being administered
intravenously. This was the child's first and only seizure, and
lasted less than a minute. He recovered quickly and there were no
apparent after-effects. Since this was an isolated incident, and
since one-quarter to one-third of all autistic children are reported
to experience at least one seizure in any case, it was difficult
to evaluate its significance.
In the meantime, we have learned of two additional cases of potentially
serious reactions to secretin infusions which we feel should be
called to the attention of parents and physicians. In one of these
cases, a seven-year-old boy experienced a 30-minute grand mal seizure
immediately after his fourth infusion of secretin. Paramedics were
called to help restore the boy's breathing. The child had responded
well to the three prior infusions, each of which had consisted of
an entire vial of Ferring secretin at 4- to 6-week intervals. The
mother was especially dismayed to have the seizure occur, inasmuch
as she had been so pleased with the outcome of the initial infusions.
The physician and mother both reported still further behavioral
improvement, and no further seizures, after this fourth infusion.
Fortunately, the infusion took place in a well-equipped medical
setting, so appropriate help and equipment were available. The father
has a serious immune deficiency, which may have been a factor.
The third case was a five-and-a-half-year-old boy who did not suffer
a seizure, but stopped breathing and had to be resuscitated after
being given a third whole vial of Ferring secretin within a 20-day
period-only 10 days apart. The child's behavior and language had
shown such remarkable improvement after each infusion that, after
thorough testing by an allergist, he has since been given two more
infusions. The more recent infusions were given about five weeks
apart. He continues to make excellent progress, which the mother
attributes largely to the secretin: "His school reports two-and-a-half
years of progress in receptive and expressive speech, and in fine
motor skills, in only eight months. There is no question that it
has made all the difference in the world to him."
The occurrence of these incidents is distressing and certainly
raises a cautionary flag to all those involved in the use of secretin,
particularly when given intravenously. Secretin, given IV, is generally
infused at a dosage level of about 2 clinical units (CU) per kilogram
of body weight, which is reported to bring about improvement for
four to six weeks, on average, in those autistic individuals it
helps.
Secretin may be given in small daily increments by topical (through
the skin), sublingual, or intramuscular means. Presumably, the risk
of side effects is much lower in those cases where the secretin
is given on a daily basis, using dosages perhaps only 3% as high.
The Repligen Company plans to develop a system for administering
secretin painlessly in small daily doses.
Although the number of cases at this point with adverse effects
is quite small, we feel it is important to call attention to them
to alert physicians to proceed cautiously and to be well-prepared
for emergency conditions should another such event occur.
It is possible that the problems described above may not be caused
by secretin but instead by the panic and stress experienced by a
child who is held down by adults while an IV needle is inserted.
It is also quite possible that the children who experienced seizures
or apnea were affected not by the quantity of secretin given, but
rather by impurities in the product. The porcine (derived from pigs)
secretin contains a significant percentage of impurities which have
not been identified. That is a major reason for the heavy emphasis
upon the much purer synthetic human secretin which is being used
in some ongoing research.
At our Defeat Autism Now (DAN!) conference in October, Repligen's
president, Walter Herlihy, presented convincing data on secretin
safety which had been compiled for the purpose of obtaining FDA
approval for secretin use in autism. Among the secretin studies
discussed was a clinical trial in which 37 adult ulcer patients
were given a 7CU/kg dose of secretin each day for seven days (as
compared with a single 2CU/kg dose at 35-day intervals, as typically
given in autism). No toxicity was found. In another study, eight
adult ulcer patients were given 18CU/kg six times per day for 10
days with no adverse effects.
While caution is certainly indicated in the use of secretin, there
are almost no biomedical treatments which do not entail some level
of risk. Fatalities from prescription drugs are a leading cause
of death in the United States. Some 140,000 people die annually
as a result of prescription drug use. The drugs that are routinely
prescribed for autistic children are certainly not devoid of risk.
No drugs have been approved by the FDA for use with autistic children,
and all drugs present the risk of serious side effects including
seizures, apnea, coma, cardiac arrest, and other life-threatening
symptoms. These drugs trade the symptoms of autism for the symptoms
of drug toxicity. Not a satisfactory solution!
In my view, secretin, although commonly referred to as a drug,
is not truly a drug in the sense that Ritalin, Prozac, and the like
are drugs. Unlike Ritalin and Prozac, secretin is an integral part
of the body's normal everyday physiology, just as are vitamins,
minerals, and other nutrients. Like a nutrient, secretin is given
to facilitate the body's normal functioning. Drugs, on the
other hand, are blocking agents, foreign to the body, given
to interfere with normal processes. That is why drugs are
so much more toxic than vitamins, minerals, and hormones.
Two child psychiatrists, both mothers of autistic sons-mothers
who did not know each other-have told me, in virtually identical
words, "It is one thing to be reading the Physician's Desk
Reference when you are looking for a drug to give another mother's
child; when it is your own child, those words take on a totally
different meaning."
I am confident that the changeover from the use of porcine secretin
to the much purer human synthetic secretin, as well as improved
administration of secretin (perhaps in small daily doses by other
than intravenous means) will improve even further secretin's already
excellent safety record. In the meantime, until these new forms
of secretin, and better forms of administration, become readily
available, great care should be exercised in the administration
of secretin to help guard against the kinds of events that have
been reported in a few cases thus far. Physicians should be prepared
for the kinds of rare but possible events described.
|